In this article we revisit the notion of territoriality, suggesting that such a focus, rather than electability, increases the universe of cases available, differentiates between these and other state-wide parties, and reveals variation between ethnoregional parties competing for support in arguably the same political space. We conclude that scholars of ethnoregional politics need to apply broadly accepted understandings of the centrality of territoriality to both case-selection criteria and dimensions of “relevance” studied in order to better understand this distinct and growing political phenomenon.

“Demarking Political Space: Territoriality and the Ethnoregional Party Family” with Britt Cartrite, Nationalism & Ethnic Politics 12:1 (2006): 53-82. Read this paper